Secretariat of the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law

Test knop

About Secretariat of the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law

Test

16 Nov

Private Sector as Peacebuilding Actor - Preliminary Findings

Organized by:Secretariat of the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law

Over the past decade, a marked transformation has taken place in the expectations of companies operating in environments of conflict and fragility, and in the hopes for the roles that they may be able to play. But growing enthusiasm for companies to seek deliberately to “support peace” has been accompanied by surprisingly little concrete, direct evidence of effective practices and approaches for doing so. Instead, contemporary discussions of business and peace have been characterized by unduly broad understandings of what impacts peace, questionable claims about how impacts on peace occur, and a lack of specificity about how companies can act constructively. Appeals to “the private sector” to engage typically present options for corporate peace interventions without any discussion of how those interventions have been, or can be, operationalized at asset-level.

CDA Collaborative Learning Projects (CDA), in partnership with the Peace Research Institute of Oslo (PRIO), and the Africa Center for Dispute Settlement of the University of Stellenbosch (ACDS), has undertaken a two-year, case-based learning project designed to provide a response to the question: “what can companies do to contribute to peace in fragile and conflict-affected states?” The presentation will be followed by an open discussion, where we will welcome your thoughts, inputs, feedback, and perspectives during a half-day discussion of these issues on Thursday, November 16, 2017 in The Hague.

Zeestraat 100 2514 JR The Hague Netherlands
02 Nov

Share your knowledge for a culture of peace in Conflict Affected States

Organized by:Secretariat of the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law

The future of Yemen is jeopardized if something does not change. A generation of children, young men and women have limited access to education and are lacking proper education. More than 1,600 schools remained closed in Yemen due to conflict-related damages (OCHA).

The Saxion Majlis

Saxion University of Applied Sciences is working with Youth Leadership Development Foundation to deliver education in Yemen. We are faced with the challenges of limited travel, insecurity, border closures, and staff turnover.

Help us on the 2nd of November to design ideas for sustainable impact of (blended learning) education and training arrangements which will empower people & NGO’s in a fragile context. Let’s join forces for change.

Your contribution to continue empowerment trough education in vulnerable parts of the world is of great value. We hope you save the date.

The program for the day can be found here.

News > ...

Direct and Indirect Consequences of the EU-Turkey Deal

03.10.2017

On 22 September the Knowledge Platform welcomed Jill Alpes and Ilse van Liempt from Utrecht University, and Orcun Ulusoy from Borderline Europe to present the preliminary findings of their NWO-funded research on the EU-Turkey deal on migration. The central question concerned whether ongoing documented human rights violations are the result of imperfect implementation of the EU-Turkey deal or fundamental problems in the design of the deal itself.

The design of the EU-Turkey deal is based on the premise that international protections are accessible to relocated persons in Turkey, the idea that migrants are distinguishable from refugees, and the notion that relocating asylum seekers to Turkey from Greece will have a deterrent effect on unregulated migratory streams to the EU.

However, preliminary findings on the direct and indirect consequences of the deal expose significant concerns over return-based management. Turkish accommodation facilities are poor and reportedly ‘detention-like’. Both Turkey and Greece lack the operational and administrative capacity to ensure access to and transparency over application as well as appeals procedures. In Turkey, poor treatment of asylum-seekers, discrimination and disenfranchisement of minorities, lacking medical facilities and scarce labor opportunities evidence a general disregard of rights of asylum-seekers. The deal arguably jeopardized the EU’s negotiations on migration deals with other countries, such as Lebanon, and devalued its human rights component.   

Recent changes in Turkish legislation further underline the uncertainty of asylum seekers’ status and safety. Decree no. 676 allows for the deportation of asylum seekers and internationals if they are alleged to have terrorist affiliations, without judicial oversight. This national provision undermines the international protection status of refugees.

The current EU-Turkey appears to disincentivize following irregular and dangerous routes into Europe and seems to have slowed migratory flows. That being said, accelerated application procedures are implemented at the cost of procedural safeguards. The resettlement portion of the deal, specifically in cases of the Netherlands acting as a receiving state, has yielded positive feedback. While the resettlement portion of the EU Turkey deal has been rendered inaccessible to most vulnerable asylum-seekers, overall the Dutch relocation and integration program has successfully maintained its functionality in response to the migration crisis.

From Responsibility Shifting to Responsibility Sharing

Discussants concluded the event by developing mitigating strategies and calling for currently operating EU deals to be analyzed for conflict potential. Fast-tracking procedures should not prevent quality assessment and diminish their accessibility. Increased European solidarity is necessary to adequately address the issue of migration and encourage responsibility sharing, although member states are constrained by political realities. Increased transparency in application procedures will mitigate discriminatory policies. Accountability on the EU level continues to be a problem, particularly in light of the General Court’s assertion that it lacks jurisdiction over the deal.

Finally, robust conversations between member states, international organizations and other actors must address conflict prevention and peacebuilding strategies in the Middle East, and must confirm commitments towards treatment of refugees as key elements towards resolving the migration crisis on the long term.

Visit URL
07 Sep

Annual Conference 2017: Elephants in the Room

Organized by:Secretariat of the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law

The Platform’s 2017 Annual Conference is titled 'Achieving Security and Justice for All: Elephants in the Room', and will explicitly focus on the contentious things we usually ignore when working on peace, security & rule of law. 

kantoor 3

What's the big idea?

Talking about these contentious issues means openly discussing how economics, gender, militarism, power, identity, moralism, corruption, religion, silver-bullet solutions, education, capitalism, or the media influence or stifle progress. It means critically asking whether the assumptions that underpin peace, security and justice work need revisiting. And it means collectively envisaging how we can better meet people's needs in ways that are committed to human rights and genuine democracy.

There will be 20 workshops and presentations throughout the day by Ted Talkers, activists, governmental policy makers, UN, EU and AU experts, NGOs, academics, artists, agitators and authors who will interrogate current policies and programs in the security and rule of law field. The sessions will be a mix of debates, workshops and research presentations, with one series of events dedicated to innovation and another to creativity in improving and spreading knowledge in our field of work. Together, and with your input, they will provide a rich body of evidence and ideas to help improve the breadth, depth and quality of the knowledge in our field.

It will be a day that eschews the usual discussions. We know that peace and security work must be context specific, adaptive, conflict sensitive, political, long term, and committed to working from the bottom up as well as the top down. Instead of reconfirming these accepted truths, each session will be given license to acknowledge and discuss the things that usually go unsaid or untouched in our field - things that often prevent us from achieving the kind of security and justice outcomes that we want. Above all, we hope it will be an insightful and entertaining day.


 

Check out the full program here. The timetable for sessions can be found here.


What kind of questions should we expect?

  • Is the current European fixation with migration threatening peace and security here as much as in source and transit countries?
  • Are we being tokenistic when we work on gender, ignoring genuine systems of exclusion that sustain insecurity and injustice worldwide?
  • Has the normalization of violence in western culture made imagining peace impossible?
  • Do democracies always contribute to peace, security and the rule of law? 
  • Is SDG16 set up to fail, and how can we make the best use of it? 

It will be a day of honest introspection, provocative debate and radical learning designed to constructively challenge assumptions. Last year's event was attended by 150 government reps, staff from the UN, EU, AU, and the World Bank, journalists, activists, Dutch embassy staff, think tanks, academics, and INGOs. This year, we do hope you can make it as well.


REGISTRATIONS ARE NOW CLOSED! Please keep an eye out for the digital magazine with a recap of the Conference and its most important insights.


Who's speaking? Have a look:

Keynote:

dsc 5798

Dr. Henrik Urdal is Director of the Peace Research Institute of Oslo (PRIO), where Prof. Galtung pioneered the field of Peace Studies. Since 2010 he has been editor in chief of the Journal of Peace Research. His recent work has focused on inequality and violence, the findings of which are central to the upcoming World Bank and UN report on conflict prevention. Dr. Urdal holds a Ph.D in Political Science from the University of Oslo and was one of the early proponents of the links between demographic pressures ('youth bulges') and violence.

 

Speakers:

Staffan I. Lindberg is Director of the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute and Professor at the Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg. He is a Wallenberg Academy Scholar, a member of the Young Academy of Sweden, Research Felow at the QoG Institute, and Senior Advisor in the International Law and Policy Institute. He holds a doctorate from the Department of Political Science from Lund University. He is the author of Democracy and Elections in Africa (2006), and the editor of Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition? (2009), and he has published articles on inter alia women’s representation, political clientelism, voting behaviour, party and electoral systems, democratization, popular attitudes, and the Ghanaian legislature and executive-legislative relationships.

Basma Abdel Aziz is a psychiatrist, writer, and sculptor. A long-standing vocal critic of government oppression in Egypt, she is the author of several works of nonfiction. In 2016 she was named one of Foreign Policy's Global Thinkers for her debut novel, The Queue, which was also nominated for the longlist for the 2017 Best Translated Book Award. She lives in Cairo.

Patrick Alley is the co-founder of Global Witness where, since posing as a timber buyer in Global Witness's first investigation into the Thai Khmer Rouge timber trade in 1995, he has taken part in over fifty field investigations in South East Asia, Africa and Europe. Patrick has worked on Global  Witness’s campaigns on conflict resources, notably former Liberian President Charles Taylor’s ‘arms for timber’ trade, the minerals trade in Eastern DRC and more recently the Central African Republic, as well as providing strategic direction for Global Witness’s work on forest issues, especially challenging industrial scale logging and land grabbing in the tropics. Global Witness were nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2003 for their campaign to combat 'blood diamonds.'

Fidelma Donlon, the Registrar of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, is a highly experienced senior court administrator and a respected academic and lawyer. As part of her longstanding career in international criminal justice, Dr Donlon has extensive experience as a senior manager at various criminal tribunals as well as significant experience in justice sector reform and judicial capacity building projects. Previously, she served as Deputy Registrar for the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and worked extensively on criminal justice and national judicial reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Catherine Marchi-Uhel was appointed Head of the International Impartial Independent Mechanism Investigating Serious Crimes in Syria in July 2017. Catherine has worked for more than 27 years in public service and in the judiciary, including for the United Nations, in the fields of criminal law, transitional justice and human rights. Previously, Marchi-Uhel served as a judge in France, with the United Nations Interim Administration in Kosovo and at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.

Shilo Shiv Sulemanan Indian contemporary artist, author, Ted Talker, INK Fellow, and founder and director of the Fearless Collective, an artistic movement formed in response to gender-related issues in India. The Fearless Collective has expanded to provoking dialogue on gender and rights through participative storytelling in fragile and conflict affected areas in Pakistan, Nepal, Tunisia, Lebanon and South Africa amongst other places. Suleman has also designed art installations for conferences and festivals such as Burning Man.

Professor Tilman Brück is the Founder and Director of ISDC. He is also Visiting Professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Team Leader – Development Economics at IGZ near Berlin, Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Research Affiliate of the Institute for Social Sciences at the University of Lisbon, and Research Fellow at the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn. Professor Brück is the co-founder and co-director of the „Households in Conflict Network (HiCN)“ and the coordinator of the Marie Curie action “Training and Mobility Network for the Economic Analysis of Conflict“ (TAMNEAC).

Marcel Smits, the European Program Director at the Institute for Economics and Peace. Previously Marcel was the Policy Specialist on Private Sector and Conflict at Oxfam, as well as the Director of the Forum on Early Warning and Early Response, the Institute for International Mediation and Conflict Resolution and the Institute for War and Peace Reporting-NL, and the Country Director for the Nonviolent Violent Peaceforce in Sri Lanka during the civil war where he worked with UN agencies and local groups to protect vulnerable groups and negotiate with rebel and paramilitary groups for the release of child soldiers.

Dr. Brad Evans, a critical theorist, political philosopher and author specializing on violence. The author of over ten books and edited volumes, Dr. Evans is a Reader in Political Violence at the School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies at the University of Bristol. He is the founder and director of the History of Violence project, and also an editor at the Los Angeles Review of Books. Prior to this he ran a series on violence in the New York Times. His inaugural guest appearance on Russell Brand’s podcast show Under the Skin charted at No. 1 on iTunes.

Larry Attree is Head of Policy at Saferworld. He is a globally recognised expert on conflict issues. Drawing on extensive peacebuilding experience in the Balkans, Africa, Asia and the Pacific, he has input extensively into global negotiations on peace and development issues including the 2030 Agenda. His expertise covers aid and conflict, stabilisation, counter-terrorism, governance and statebuilding, arms control and armed violence reduction, reintegration, community security, security and justice sector development and conflict sensitivity. He is the author of many recent Saferworld reports and articles on counter-terror and stabilisation, including new case studies on counter-terror in Kenya on Lamu and Garissa Counties, and the 2017 long-read ‘Shouldn’t you be Countering Violent Extremism?’

Dr. Alastair Reed is Acting Director of the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. Prior to this he was Research Coordinator and a Research Fellow at ICCT, joining ICCT and Leiden University’s Institute of Security and Global Affairs in the autumn of 2014. Previously, he was an Assistant Professor at Utrecht University, where he completed his doctorate on research focused on understanding the processes of escalation and de-escalation in Ethnic Separatist conflicts in India and the Philippines.

And more to be announced! Keep up to date by following our newsletter or by emailing Steven Lanting.

Zuid Hollandlaan 7, 2596 AL, The Hague, Netherlands
News > ...

Lessons from Land Programming in the Great Lakes Region

22.06.2017

The importance of land in the Great Lakes Region of Africa is undeniable. It is central to livelihoods and identity, and unfortunately also to conflict. Scarcity of land and questions about ownership drive violent conflict. Improper land governance problematizes prevention and resolution of this violence.

Read the one-pager of recommendations for land programming in the Great Lakes Region.

Together with Search for Common Ground, the Platform organized an expert meeting on 15 June to address land issues in the region. Bringing together a number of policy makers, practitioners and researchers working on and in the region, the meeting encouraged reflection on and exchange of (un)successful approaches to tackling land issues.

img 20170615 095800

Root causes and drivers – and different priorities

Throughout the discussion, it was apparent that the priorities on the side of donor governments have shifted from land governance specifically to conflict more generally, and, in particular, migration. On the other hand, it was acknowledged that improper land governance and consequent land grievances are catalysts for both violent conflict and migration from the region.

The meeting highlighted a number of sources of conflict in relation to land. To begin with, various groups in society lack access to land, which leads to grievances that often flare into violence – even within families. Women in particular struggle with access to land. They are limited by patriarchal inheritance laws and unfavorable land registration policies. Additionally, the fear of reprisals or exclusion, and the lack of recourse to justice mechanisms, prevent women from taking claims to objective arbiters.

In Burundi, as well as elsewhere in the region, returnees that fled the country make claims on land that is now in the hands of others. Contested claims spur violence among neighbors and within communities. Unclear or outdated land registration documents prevent dispute resolution on the basis of fact, and, in some cases, only serve to worsen the situation.

While some participants argued that the lack of awareness of land governance legislation among communities in the region prevents them from addressing land injustices, others countered that often the awareness of laws is present, but enforcement by officials and local or state institutions is non-existent. Raising awareness through targeted campaigns must therefore be coupled with institutional development and real change in how land rights are enforced by authorities.

As often is the case, widespread corruption at every level of governance, from the community to the national level, exacerbates many of the aforementioned hurdles to peaceful land governance. Formal institutions tasked with land registration, adjudication and enforcement are all susceptible to corruption. As such, informal mechanisms, like mediation, present themselves as alternative options.

Addressing and mitigating conflicts

Training mediators – often women – proved to be a successful way to find solutions for land disputes that are acceptable to all parties involved, without recourse to local or state institutions. Mediators are taught to bring disputing parties together to find amicable solutions outside of regulatory frameworks. By training women and giving them an important role in resolving disputes, the program also helps to shift the perception and enhance the standing of these women in the community, as well as their involvement in land affairs in general.

A different method of mitigating or preventing land conflicts is to create opportunities for alternative livelihoods. Many land issues center on a lack of alternatives to subsistence farming. As such, employment in other sectors could help ease land scarcity and reduce contested land claims. However, doing so requires two major shifts. The first is the actual creation of sustainable alternatives. In many of the Great Lakes countries, this may be difficult to achieve without donor or government support. The second is a shift in attitudes towards a positive view of work in other sectors and away from the exclusivity of subsistence farming as a livelihood in the region.

Recommendations going forward

The Platform and Search for Common Ground will compile a one-pager that outlines the most important recommendations for policy makers and practitioners to address land issues.

22 May

Kickoff Knowledge Platform 2.0

Organized by:Secretariat of the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law
Register for this event

We invite you to join us on 22 May for the Kickoff of the Platform 2.0. We will celebrate the second phase, which started in January of this year, and show you what we have been up to and where we hope to take the Platform in the coming months and years.

Come prepared to be taken out of your comfort zone! To hit the ground running, we will host a debate on a provocative motion about development and migration. Speakers will include Dr. Mirjam van Reisen and representatives from the Migration Cluster of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

We will also officially launch our new Knowledge Management Fund, so you will have the opportunity to ask us any questions you have about new funding possibilities. After the kickoff, you will have a chance to catch up with colleagues and friends over drinks.

Practical information

Date: 22 May 2017
Time: 3PM - 7PM

Address: Bazaar of Ideas, Hoefkade 9, The Hague

Register for this event
Hoefkade 9, 2526 BN, The Hague, Netherlands
News > ...

The Gold Standard: Exploring the added value of the Dutch knowledge platforms

08.03.2017

The Dutch Knowledge Platforms are said to “have gold in their hands”.  A recently concluded learning review provides insight into the achievements and added value of the five Knowledge Platforms since their kick-off three years ago.

The Platforms were established following the Kennisbrief that was sent to Parliament in 2011 by the then Dutch State Secretary for Development Cooperation, Mr Ben Knapen. The Platforms have been structured around five strategic themes for development cooperation: food and nutrition security; sexual and reproductive health and rights; security and rule of law; water for development; and inclusive development policies.

While the Knowledge Platforms are diverse in their organization and strategy, the reviewers identify common “gems”, such as the multi-stakeholder approach that lies at the core of their institutional strategy. The Platforms do not operate in a vacuum. Instead, they are positioned among a diverse range of actors: ministries, NGOs, research institutes, consultancies, businesses,  and more. As such, their existence does not only serve to fulfil only the needs of the Dutch government, but rather provides a meaningful way to take stock of multiple and varied perspectives in order to pursue a greater good. The learning review highlights further achievements of the Platforms, including their convening power and their unique ability to address emerging and contested issues.

According to the review, the Platforms also offer an opportunity to move towards more institutionalized knowledge relations. The conception of the Platforms was prefaced by the identification of specific gaps in knowledge creation, exchange, and use in the Dutch development sector.. Significant lacunae included a lack of focus and coherence in research programming, weak relations between different stakeholders, and fragmented use of knowledge by ministries and other practitioners. The Platforms have so far been most successful in knowledge creation and exchange, while knowledge use remains a tough nut to crack. Nevertheless, the review shows that the foundations are in place to get ‘knowledge to work’ for the stakeholders involved.

Internationally, the Dutch approach to knowledge brokering has been well-received. International stakeholders have increasingly expressed interest to learn more about the added value of such an innovative approach to the development sector.